Go to Homepage



Wisconsin defense attorney, Wisconsin criminal lawyerMost Americans are aware of the mandated sex offender registry for convicted sex offenders. Used in all 50 states, it is accessible by the public and provides names, descriptions, and photographs of those that have served their time and then been released back into society. However, few are aware that there are many other types of criminal registries that, depending on state and circumstance, may also be viewable by the public. The most recently opened is a white collar crime registry in Utah.

The Rise of Offender Registries

Over the last several years, registries for convicted offenders of various crimes have grown exponentially. Five states monitor those convicted of arson. Seven have registries for methamphetamine producers, and Indiana offers a public website that lets visitors use Google Maps to find the location of homes that have been used as meth labs. In Tennessee, those convicted of animal abuse must register. And in the state of Florida, anyone convicted of a felony of any kind must register for up to five years after completing their sentence. Some of these registries are restricted to law enforcement or fire official use, but others are searchable to the public, just like the sex offender registries.


Wisconsin defense attorney, Wisconsin criminal lawyer, Wisconsin white collar crimes attorneyWhite collar crimes are often complex and involve months and years of preparations before prosecutors bring formal charges. There is no official set of crimes under the law called white collar crimes. However, federal and state crimes involving fraud and finances are generally considered to be white collar crimes. These include things such as embezzlement, securities fraud, computer crimes, and identity theft.

Dangers of a Lengthy Investigation

Because white collar crimes often involve many different sets of financial records and a complicated set of facts, the investigations are often lengthy. Law enforcement investigations may span months, or even years..


Wisconsin defense attorney, Wisconsin criminal lawyer, Wisconsin white collar crimes attorneyFraud, forgery, and criminal charges resulting from writing a bad check can seem rather similar. However, there are some significant differences between these types of offenses; the most notable of which rests in the defendant’s intentions. If you are facing criminal charges for fraud, forgery, or charges related to writing a bad check, know your rights and how you may best take action to avoid maximum penalties.


Forgery is defrauding another through the alteration or writing of an object so that it appears it was written or made by another individual. For example, a woman recently had a warrant issued for her arrest after allegedly altering a check written to her by a resident at the centerat which she works. Originally written for $11, she reportedly changed it to read $11,000 and then deposited the check into her bank. Possession or use of an altered document may also constitute forgery charges, even if the person in possession of the document was not the one who altered it.


Wisconsin defense attorney, Wisconsin criminal lawyer, Wisconsin white collar crimes attorneyAlthough Wisconsin does not call it “embezzlement,” the act of pilfering money or property by an employee is delineated under Wisconsin statute 943.20 is a felony. This “theft” statute defines the illegal action of any person who has taken funds or property, greater than $10,000 in value, without the owner’s consent and resulting in personal or business gain for the offender. Although prosecution and restitution may be handled as a civil matter between the business or entity that has experienced loss and the alleged person responsible for the loss, embezzlement cases are often charged criminally.

In fact, one historical Wisconsin embezzlement case secured a coveted ranking on the Marquet International, Ltd. top ten list of embezzlement cases in the United States.  Marquet International, Ltd.© is an international investigative and security consulting firm, headed by industry veteran Christopher T. Marquet.  Sujata “Sue” Sachdeva of Wisconsin was placed in the ninth slot on his list of historical embezzlement cases. As Chief Financial Officer for Koss Corporation in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Sachdeva reportedly embezzled an estimated $40.9 million dollars (2010 calculations) through fraudulent fund transfers. The scope of her embezzlement spanned 12 years, beginning in 1997 and ending in December 2009 when her white collar crime spree was disclosed. Although Sachdeva first pled not guilty, she later changed her plea and on November 17, 2010, received an 11 year prison sentence. Although embezzlement cases may bring to mind corporate indiscretions, another infamous Wisconsin embezzlement case is that of Laura J. Craig of Oakwood, Wisconsin. Craig, who served as the bookkeeper for the Salem United Methodist Church, Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, was sentenced to nine months in jail after she was found guilty of embezzlement of $113,000 from the church between January 2007 through May of 2008. For those accused of committing embezzlement fraud under Wisconsin law, the guidelines for punishment are as follows:
  • If the value of the property is less than $2,500, the defendant is looking at a misdemeanor punishable by up to nine months in jail and a fine of $10,000;
  • If the value of the property is between $2,500 and $5,000, the defendant is looking at jail time up to four years with the crime now being identified as a felony and punishable by a $10,000 fine;
  • If the value of the property extends from $5,000 to $10,000, the charge is also classified as a felony and punishable by up to six years in prison with an attached $10,000 fine; or
  • If the value of the property exceeds $10,000, the charge is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison with a $25,000 fine.
If you are currently facing a theft charge under Wisconsin Statute 943.20, the experienced Milwaukee criminal law attorneys of Gimbel, Reilly, Guerin & Brown LLP would like to review your case. Contact our office at 414-271-1440 to discuss the charges, possible penalties and what legal options may be available to you. Sources: http://wicourts.gov/services/judge/truth.htm http://marquetinternational.com/ http://marquetinternational.com/pdf/top_10_embezzlement_cases_in_us_history.pdf

Wisconsin defense attorney, Wisconsin criminal lawyer, Wisconsin white collar crimes attorneyThe mention of the Rico Law or more formally, the 18 U.S. Code Chapter 96, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) often brings to mind the five Mafia families convicted in New York City on November 19, 1986. Although the Rico Law has been on the books since 1970 when Congress passed the Act in an effort to combat organized crime, many criminal defense attorneys first shied away from using the act as a prosecution tool because they did not fully understand the power of the Act.

Often referred to as the atomic bomb that brought the Five Mafia Families to their knees, the RICO Act was evoked to establish the intertwined families as an operating commission linked to criminal activity for monetary gain.

Although today’s crime syndicates appear less territorial and open to stronger collaborative bonds, prosecution under the RICO Act remains in play today.

Back to Top